Talk:Korean Broadcasting System

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pure In Heart/Pure 19

I think this is the same show, but which year did it start? 2005, or 2006? CanbekEsen 15:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Took out the "KBS redirects here." thing, since it doesn't redirect to this page anymore and leads to a disambiguation page. 82.41.66.173 08:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)DanZieBoy[reply]

Introduction Section : Irrelevance?

The introduction section to the article is mainly explaining about other major TV networks in Korea. Seems irrelevant. How about rewriting the section? --Hongmt (talk) 17:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scandals and phrasing

The scandals sections is way too much blown out of proportion. This is an encyclopedia article, and not a yellow press magazine... Also the language is like that of a magazine, phrases like " hooked up" are no appropriate for an encyclopedia. Way too much irrelevant quotes from celebrities that add nothing to the subject of the article. Teemeah ^{편지 (letter)} 15:00, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since nobody commented for almost a year, I trimmed the section down. The article should not be a collection of every incident that ever happened at KBS. Major ones have a place, discussed briefly, as Wikipedia is NOT a news platform! Individual issues with movies, songs and television series should be discussed in the respective articles of those, and not here. A lot of the claims are extremely biased and without proper sourcing. Teemeah ^{편지 (letter)} 12:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Point of View issue with broadcasting articles.

Hi,

I've noticed that the Broadcasting Station articles (like KBS in this case) has many controversial events written, which is mostly un-neutral (written in a way that goes against the broadcasting station itself in most cases). Also, some of the details (like Cheating on Charts, being unfair to BIGBANG, etc.) should be omitted altogether as it does not belong on an Encyclopedia. Please explain why these "Controversies" are needed in the article.

Thanks.

Tibbydibby (talk) 01:35, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work!.

North8000 (talk) 13:09, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]